Difference between CBD and CBDa

Difference between CBD and CBDa

The popularity of cannabis has progressed. It is undoubtedly because of numerous therapeutic advantages associated with CBD. However, marijuana has more than 100 compounds, and CBDa is one of those cannabinoids that has grown popular due to its health advantages. Although with the popularity of CBD, most people are not aware of the CBDa or cannabidiolic acid. CBDa is the acid precursor of CBD that stands for cannabidiolic acid. It is found in the resin of ‘raw’ cannabis plant. CBDa breaks down into CBD from its acidic form through a process known as decarboxylation. Through the process of baking, lighting, or heating, CBDa is transformed into CBD.

WHAT IS CBDa?

CBD exists in growing cannabis plants in minimal amounts. In growing plants, CBD exists as cannabidiolic acid (CBDa). It isn’t until the plant is cut, dehydrated, and ignited that CBD is formed. CBD is a calming phytochemical which (after consumption) does not cause a psychotropic effect in mind.

Cannabis flowers go through notable changes as they dry. In fresh flowers, the active components are found as acids. When cannabis is dried and burned, these acids break down into more popular compounds like THC and CBD.

CBD VS CBDa

Cannabidiolic acid is one of the main cannabinoids produced on the stems, leaves, and flowers of some types of cannabis plants. Only certain strains, like AC/DC, Cannatonic, Harlequin, and Sour Tsunami, are high in CBDa. Hemp can also be a viable source of this.

Decarboxylation is the method by which carbon dioxide and hydrogen are removed from it, converting it into CBD. This reaction can happen naturally as the plant ages from exposure to light and heat; however, it is more often stimulated by heating cannabis when smoking high CBD cannabis types. Because of their related chemical structure, CBDa and CBD have the same healing effects. However, there are some differences between the two molecules. The basic difference between the two is the amount of research carried on each cannabinoid.

ROLES IN THE BODY

Both compounds are similar in a way that they activate the endocannabinoid system, but most popularly CBD is in the buzz as compared to CBDa.

ECS when functions correctly, helps regulate digestion, mood, sleep, immune function, memory, pain, fertility, and other vital bodily functions. Both CBDa and CBD interact with the endocannabinoid system when employing many conditions, such as Parkinson’s Disease, Alzheimer’s, Diabetes, MS, Epilepsy, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and inflammation.

The case study discovered that CBDa inhibited the growth of a particularly aggressive form of breast cancer. The experts say more research is required to discover the exact mechanisms accountable for the promising result. Unlike CBDa, where there is limited research into its capability to fight cancer, many studies have proved CBD to be a potent anti-cancer agent.

A promising aspect of CBD’s role in fighting cancer examines at how CBD encourages apoptosis. Apoptosis is primarily the process of a cell self-destructing. When apoptosis does not happen, cells divide out of control, resulting, which eventually leads to cancer. Numerous studies have explained CBD promotes apoptosis in many ways in the body. Italian researchers found that reactive oxygen species (a group of molecules) reduced the growth of cancer by restricting the amount of oxygen absorbed by the out of control cells.

Added difference between CBDa and CBD is how they are consumed. Because CBDa is only discovered on the raw cannabis plant, CBDa is often ingested through juicing high CBD cannabis. Juicing raw cannabis is a popular method of ingesting medical cannabis. Patients often mix fruit with cannabis to reduce bitterness, and because cannabis is an excellent source for phytonutrients and fiber, cannabis juice can work almost any diet. Raw high CBD can be used in salads or other uncooked meals to deliver CBDa to a patient’s endocannabinoid system. Not sure where to find CBD? Try CBDOILS.com for high-quality CBD oils!

Leave a Reply